Jews Face Hostility in Hospitals and Schools

February 3, 2026


STAY INFORMED – TALKING POINTS – ACTIONS TO CONSIDER – STORIES MAKING NEWS

Jewish Doctors, Patients, Teachers and Students Face Rising Hostility

A growing number of medical professionals, teachers and local labor leaders are tolerating conduct that has made workplaces hostile for Jewish patients, students and employees. Documented cases – including discrimination and exclusion based on religion and ethnicity – have eroded trust in institutions meant to serve the public fairly and professionally. Leaders and professionals are exploiting their authority to advance ideological agendas, silence dissent and target Jewish colleagues and their allies.

Medicine and Mental Health: Ideology Enters the Exam Room

After the Iran-backed Hamas massacre of Israelis on Oct. 7, 2023, Jewish patients and healthcare professionals began reporting a rise in hostile and exclusionary behavior – especially among psychologists.

Chicago therapist Heba Ibrahim-Joudeh created a blacklist of “Zionist” therapists to avoid. Zionist often is used as a codeword for Jews – and it is unclear how the therapist knew the healthcare professionals were Zionists beyond their Jewish-sounding names. Ironically, she posted in a Facebook group named Chicago Anti-Racist Therapists: “I’ve put together a list of therapists/practices with Zionist affiliations that we should avoid referring clients to. Please feel free to contribute additional names as I’m certain there are more out there.” Her post received enthusiastic support.

These incidents align with growing concerns inside the American Psychological Association – the nation’s leading accreditor for psychological training. Last year, more than 3,500 mental health professionals signed a letter warning APA leadership of “serious and systemic anti-Jewish hate” – citing official educational conference statements and programs that included:

  • Rationalizations of violence against Jews and Israelis
  • Antisemitic tropes
  • Holocaust distortion
  • Minimizing Jewish fear
  • Calling the Jewish people’s connection to their indigenous homeland a pathology.

Former APA division president Lara Sheehi publicly described Zionism as a “settler psychosis” and posted messages calling to “destroy Zionism.” Villanova Univ. Counseling Center Director Nathalie Edmond portrayed Zionism as a form of psychological pathology – placing it on a “Colonized Mind” slide in a presentation, alongside fascism – treating Jewish identity as a condition to be corrected.

These concerns have reached federal authorities. The Brandeis Center recently led a meeting with the Office for Civil Rights director at the Health and Human Services Dept. The delegation included the American Jewish Medical Association, Hadassah, the ADL, Jewish Federations of North America and StandWithUs. ADL director Dan Granot: “Hospitals must remain places of healing, not hate.”

Recently in the UK, government healthcare workers marched in scrubs and chanted, “Kick the Zionists out,” while making a kicking motion with their feet. Also, in Australia, two former nurses, Sarah Abu Lebdeh and Ahmad Rashad Nadir, pleaded not guilty in court to charges of harassment and violent threats. During an interview, Nadir boasted, “You have no idea how many Israeli sh*t dogs have come to this hospital, and I sent them to hell,” and Abu Lebdeh also advocated violence: “I won’t treat them, I’ll kill them.”

Administrators and Educators: Tolerating Hatred in the Classroom

The National Education Association is committed to “championing justice,” “maintaining the highest professional standards” and providing “equal opportunity to all students.” The results conflict with a recent StandWithUs survey showing that the largest U.S. labor union continues to ignore concerns from its Jewish educators:

  • 62% of Jewish educators reported personally experiencing or witnessing antisemitism (anti-Jewish hate) in professional environments
  • 46% were exposed to antisemitism from their own teachers’ unions
  • Only 10% of required anti-bias trainings included content about antisemitism

NEA Jewish Affairs Caucus Interim Chair Alyson Brauning: “These findings – while disturbing – do not come as a shock. They reveal a serious disconnect between stated commitments to equity and the lived realities of Jewish educators. Overt and subtle antisemitism continue to shape workplace environments in ways that undermine safety, belonging and professional participation.”

NEA President Becky Pringle recently was accused of ignoring Jewish concerns during a Holocaust education event. During the webinar hosted by the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, CEO Amy Spitalnick shared that Jewish NEA members “felt pain and fear at conventions where they were specifically targeted or ostracized simply for being Jewish.” Pringle did not respond. She also linked the Holocaust with today’s political activism and falsely accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza.

The California Faculty Association circulated a questionnaire to political candidates in October asking whether they had accepted funds or endorsements from several organizations, including the Jewish Public Affairs Committee of California – a nonpartisan coalition of community groups. The CFA stated that it would not support candidates who accept donations from groups that “harm working people” – but JPAC does not fund candidates. JPAC includes nonprofits, professional associations and several progressive groups.

A landmark UN educational survey released on Holocaust Remembrance Day also reported troubling results: 78% of European Union teachers encountered at least one antisemitic incident among students – with 27% witnessing nine or more – and 42% of teachers witnessing anti-Jewish hatred from other teachers.

Labor Unions: Importing Campus Activism into the Workplace

Columbia Univ. graduate student, instructor and antizionist activist Johannah King-Slutzky was arrested during the 2024 campus encampment and takeover of Hamilton Hall. Now, she is helping lead a unionization effort at Israeli-owned Breads Bakery in NYC – despite never having worked for the company.

The union drive is moving beyond workplace conditions and into demands tied explicitly to Jewish communal life. The bakery workers who recently signed union authorization cards stating that their “struggle for fair pay, respect and safety is connected to struggles against genocide.” They called on the bakery to stop participating in the Great Nosh – an annual NYC Jewish food festival – and refused to bake cookies with an image of the Israeli flag. The workers signed with a local United Auto Workers union.

The Association of Legal Aid Attorneys (ALAA), a member of a different UAW local, recently settled a discrimination lawsuit brought by Louis Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law on behalf of three members. Union members targeted the plaintiffs – two Jews and one non-Jew – as “Zionist ghouls” for opposing a one-sided anti-Israel resolution. The Legal Aid Society – the actual employer of the ALAA staff – had called the resolution “laden with coded antisemitic language and thinly veiled calls for the destruction of the State of Israel.”

  1. Hostile work environments become normalized when employers tolerate discrimination: Workplace hostility rarely begins as policy – it becomes normalized through inaction. When leadership ignores discrimination or treats it as a secondary concern, employees learn that expressions of hateful bias carry no cost. Silence is a permission slip that enables bad actors to target, harass or harm workers and get away with it. Left unchallenged, this corrodes professional standards, undermines trust and exposes institutions to legal, ethical and operational risk. Tolerating discrimination is not passive – it actively corrupts workplace culture.
  2. Patients should not have to worry whether care is politically conditional: Healthcare depends on trust, neutrality and professional ethics. When patients fear that their ethnic, religious or national identity may affect access to care – trust collapses. Clinical decisions must be guided by medical judgment and patient need, not ideological alignment. Allowing politics to intrude into healthcare settings risks delayed treatment, compromised outcomes and avoidable patient harm. In medicine, discrimination is not just misconduct – it is a frightening patient-safety concern.
  3. Professional neutrality matters in classrooms: Parents expect teachers and administrators to foster critical thinking – not impose their personal politics. For generations, educators understood that political views were checked at the classroom door. When that norm breaks down, their power shifts from teaching students how to think, to telling them what to think. This is a dangerous, slippery slope. Once educators use their position to advance ideology, professionalism erodes and trust collapses in America’s education system.
  4. Ideological litmus tests are replacing worker representation: Labor unions are intended to advocate for better wages, benefits and working conditions across diverse workforces. When union leaders and members elevate political demands unrelated to the workplace, representation gives way to enforcement. Workers who dissent face pressure, exclusion or retaliation – regardless of job performance or seniority. This shift undermines the core purpose of collective bargaining and leaves unions vulnerable to legal challenge, internal fracture and loss of legitimacy among the workers they claim to represent.

Addressing workplace discrimination requires deliberate engagement with institutional accountability, professional standards and civic participation that reinforce equal treatment under the law.

  • Support enforcement and accountability efforts: Engage with civil-rights organizations, professional associations and watchdog groups that investigate discrimination and pursue remedies when institutions fail to act, including the ADLAmerican Jewish Medical AssociationLouis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law (Gethealthcarehelp@brandeiscenter.com), StandWithUsStopAntisemitism and The Lawfare Project.
  • Document and report misconduct: Maintain detailed records of discriminatory incidents and use internal reporting channels, including HR, compliance offices or professional oversight boards to create an official record.
  • Strengthen oversight through civic participation: Consider running for or supporting candidates for school boards, union leadership, licensing boards or local councils to ensure that workplaces and public institutions uphold non-discrimination standards.

Stories Impacting American Jews

Stories Impacting the U.S. and Israel

Stories from Around the World


Click Below to Access Additional Focus Project Resources:

Stay Informed | Speak Up | Take Action

Want to Read More of Our Talking Points? Did you miss a recent edition of The Focus Project? No need to search your inbox. Our most recently published editions are available on our website.

This content is developed by The Focus Project in partnership with MERCAZ USA. The Focus Project distributes weekly news and talking points on timely issues concerning Israel and the Jewish people, including antisemitism, anti-Zionism and the delegitimization of Israel. It represents a consensus view across a spectrum of major American Jewish organizations. MERCAZ USA recognizes and respects the diversity of views on these issues among its readers and the community at large.

The Focus Project develops and distributes news, background, history and weekly talking points on timely issues to inform individuals and organizations about issues affecting the American Jewish community and Israel, and help readers speak with more consistency and clarity. The editions also provide potential responses for addressing incidents of antisemitism and anti-Zionism. With input from a spectrum of major American Jewish organizations, we focus on that which unites us, rising above political and individual agendas.
Recognizing that hatred of Jews comes in many forms and directions, we strive to address all sources as they arise, and educate our growing audience on topics ranging from inter-religious relations to relevant international developments. From week to week, we may focus on issues arising from the political left, university campuses, from the political right and from institutions, government, and corporations. We don’t try to address all issues in each edition. We hope you will find this information useful in your writing and/or speaking. We are always open to your feedback: info@focus-project.org.
Copyright © 2026 The Focus Project. All rights reserved.